<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Theological Thoughts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theologicalthoughts.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theologicalthoughts.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 06:49:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Should Christians Watch TV, Movies or Video Games? by Jake</title>
		<link>http://theologicalthoughts.com/should-christians-watch-tv-movies-or-video-games/comment-page-1/#comment-3028</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 06:49:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theologicalthoughts.com/?p=39#comment-3028</guid>
		<description>I assume this is a case of being sensible really. One question though, How does one make sure he is NOT secretly enjoying immorality in his heart or mind? A great concern of mine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I assume this is a case of being sensible really. One question though, How does one make sure he is NOT secretly enjoying immorality in his heart or mind? A great concern of mine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Divorced Men as Elders And the &#8220;Husband of One Wife&#8221; by John Jordan</title>
		<link>http://theologicalthoughts.com/divorced-men-as-elders-and-the-husband-of-one-wife/comment-page-1/#comment-2948</link>
		<dc:creator>John Jordan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2012 21:20:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theologicalthoughts.com/?p=152#comment-2948</guid>
		<description>I seen where you stood on this all theses years and now you are saying who are faithful to his wife, Then 1Timothy3:12 Husband of one wife. I am very confused, I once went to my pastor ask Mr......would make a good deacon, he says he can&#039;t he has been married before. I see  it says Husband of one wife, I under stand the widow remarries..I am still confused, I have always gone to your thoughts on  bible issues and even from my church on views, I am 59 yrs young please help me more understand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I seen where you stood on this all theses years and now you are saying who are faithful to his wife, Then 1Timothy3:12 Husband of one wife. I am very confused, I once went to my pastor ask Mr&#8230;&#8230;would make a good deacon, he says he can&#8217;t he has been married before. I see  it says Husband of one wife, I under stand the widow remarries..I am still confused, I have always gone to your thoughts on  bible issues and even from my church on views, I am 59 yrs young please help me more understand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Is Ghandi in heaven or hell? by drbeck</title>
		<link>http://theologicalthoughts.com/is-ghandi-in-heaven-or-hell/comment-page-1/#comment-2781</link>
		<dc:creator>drbeck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2012 01:51:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theologicalthoughts.com/?p=214#comment-2781</guid>
		<description>Hi Cheri. Many of the concerns you made in your comment are answered here:
http://www.gty.org/resources/sermons/80-377/saved-by-what</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Cheri. Many of the concerns you made in your comment are answered here:<br />
<a href="http://www.gty.org/resources/sermons/80-377/saved-by-what" rel="nofollow">http://www.gty.org/resources/sermons/80-377/saved-by-what</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Is Ghandi in heaven or hell? by Cheri Foster</title>
		<link>http://theologicalthoughts.com/is-ghandi-in-heaven-or-hell/comment-page-1/#comment-2759</link>
		<dc:creator>Cheri Foster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2012 02:03:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theologicalthoughts.com/?p=214#comment-2759</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think anyone should get a free pass, but Gandhi in hell? Why do we need to think that. I believe, after watching my father die, that Christ comes to each person when they die and then they have a final choice to say &quot;Oh, it was you all along&quot;, or &quot;I don&#039;t want you&quot;. I believe that hell as a cutting off from God does exist, but we don&#039;t know and can&#039;t judge. And I&#039;m sorry, but I have some issues with Paul. He seems to often bring his own ideas in, instead of staying with what Jesus taught. Maybe because he didn&#039;t know Him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think anyone should get a free pass, but Gandhi in hell? Why do we need to think that. I believe, after watching my father die, that Christ comes to each person when they die and then they have a final choice to say &#8220;Oh, it was you all along&#8221;, or &#8220;I don&#8217;t want you&#8221;. I believe that hell as a cutting off from God does exist, but we don&#8217;t know and can&#8217;t judge. And I&#8217;m sorry, but I have some issues with Paul. He seems to often bring his own ideas in, instead of staying with what Jesus taught. Maybe because he didn&#8217;t know Him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Were Adam and Eve Real Humans? by Richie</title>
		<link>http://theologicalthoughts.com/were-adam-and-eve-real-humans/comment-page-1/#comment-1874</link>
		<dc:creator>Richie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 18:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theologicalthoughts.com/?p=275#comment-1874</guid>
		<description>While I was at Biola, I debated this with numerous people on both sides of the spectrum. After reading your article, it made me wonder, although I would agree that understanding sin is important to understand  the necessary work of Christ, I&#039;m not sure if original sin is. The one original sin does serve is as a theodicy, by stating that we are the cause of the fall, which is more of an apologetic  answer for the problem of evil rather than the sole reason for the necessity of Christ dying on the cross. As long as that part of the Bible is seen as a narrative of reality like a biography, or a tool to say that man fell as a result of himself, there may not be a problem because the theodicy will have served itself. But good inquiry!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I was at Biola, I debated this with numerous people on both sides of the spectrum. After reading your article, it made me wonder, although I would agree that understanding sin is important to understand  the necessary work of Christ, I&#8217;m not sure if original sin is. The one original sin does serve is as a theodicy, by stating that we are the cause of the fall, which is more of an apologetic  answer for the problem of evil rather than the sole reason for the necessity of Christ dying on the cross. As long as that part of the Bible is seen as a narrative of reality like a biography, or a tool to say that man fell as a result of himself, there may not be a problem because the theodicy will have served itself. But good inquiry!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Coming Persecution by Richie</title>
		<link>http://theologicalthoughts.com/the-coming-persecution/comment-page-1/#comment-1873</link>
		<dc:creator>Richie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 17:34:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theologicalthoughts.com/?p=281#comment-1873</guid>
		<description>Great article! The question is, how will they present gay history? Will they teach that it was once in the DSM as a mental disorder and only removed due to political reasoning, not scientific? Probably not. History will be rewritten to further push the homosexual agenda.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article! The question is, how will they present gay history? Will they teach that it was once in the DSM as a mental disorder and only removed due to political reasoning, not scientific? Probably not. History will be rewritten to further push the homosexual agenda.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Were Adam and Eve Real Humans? by Haley beck</title>
		<link>http://theologicalthoughts.com/were-adam-and-eve-real-humans/comment-page-1/#comment-1290</link>
		<dc:creator>Haley beck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 01:44:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theologicalthoughts.com/?p=275#comment-1290</guid>
		<description>I often wonder how how Adam and Eve could populate the whole world with all it&#039;s people, but I know God&#039;s word is true and therefore I don&#039;t doubt that it did happen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I often wonder how how Adam and Eve could populate the whole world with all it&#8217;s people, but I know God&#8217;s word is true and therefore I don&#8217;t doubt that it did happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Babywise and Theology: Is the Ezzo Method Biblical? by SueO</title>
		<link>http://theologicalthoughts.com/babywise-and-theology-is-the-ezzo-method-biblical/comment-page-1/#comment-1241</link>
		<dc:creator>SueO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2011 23:56:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theologicalthoughts.com/?p=193#comment-1241</guid>
		<description>First, a question:  Is this the method that teaches that children should not be allowed to make any of their own decisions because there&#039;s a scripture that (loosely paraphrased) says not to be wise in your own eyes?

And, a couple thoughts.... I have always found that the Biblical representation of God the Father fits well with what psychologists know about child-rearing - consistency, firmness, high expectations, and deep and abiding love no matter what.  My thought - the child has to *know* that the parent has that deep abiding love.  How can a baby left to cry *know* such a thing?  They have no other way to communicate.  They  must be terrified!  At least, that&#039;s how mine looked to me.

I also noticed that several of the posters appeared to say that their children turned out a certain way because of some narrow aspect of their parenting (e.g., feeding schedules).  Research is also fairly consistent on the point that there are MANY influences on how a child turns out - including inborn temperamental characteristics, parenting, siblings, peers, etc.  It appears (from research and also makes sense) that it&#039;s more about an overall pattern of parenting than about a single specific parenting practice.  For example, feeding on demand is *one* way to demonstrate deep abiding love, but there are others.  Parents who schedule feedings may do other things that communicate that love; while parents who feed on demand may still end up with kids who don&#039;t feel loved for another reason.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First, a question:  Is this the method that teaches that children should not be allowed to make any of their own decisions because there&#8217;s a scripture that (loosely paraphrased) says not to be wise in your own eyes?</p>
<p>And, a couple thoughts&#8230;. I have always found that the Biblical representation of God the Father fits well with what psychologists know about child-rearing &#8211; consistency, firmness, high expectations, and deep and abiding love no matter what.  My thought &#8211; the child has to *know* that the parent has that deep abiding love.  How can a baby left to cry *know* such a thing?  They have no other way to communicate.  They  must be terrified!  At least, that&#8217;s how mine looked to me.</p>
<p>I also noticed that several of the posters appeared to say that their children turned out a certain way because of some narrow aspect of their parenting (e.g., feeding schedules).  Research is also fairly consistent on the point that there are MANY influences on how a child turns out &#8211; including inborn temperamental characteristics, parenting, siblings, peers, etc.  It appears (from research and also makes sense) that it&#8217;s more about an overall pattern of parenting than about a single specific parenting practice.  For example, feeding on demand is *one* way to demonstrate deep abiding love, but there are others.  Parents who schedule feedings may do other things that communicate that love; while parents who feed on demand may still end up with kids who don&#8217;t feel loved for another reason.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The New NIV Translation Forces You To Choose by A Ave</title>
		<link>http://theologicalthoughts.com/the-new-niv-translation-force-you-to-choose/comment-page-1/#comment-1184</link>
		<dc:creator>A Ave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 02:42:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theologicalthoughts.com/?p=178#comment-1184</guid>
		<description>Well, at least we can go to the other translations .. I believe the NASB is still around and one of the most literal translations.. Glad for that..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, at least we can go to the other translations .. I believe the NASB is still around and one of the most literal translations.. Glad for that..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Home Churches in America by Autumn Beck</title>
		<link>http://theologicalthoughts.com/home-churches-in-america/comment-page-1/#comment-918</link>
		<dc:creator>Autumn Beck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 May 2011 02:45:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theologicalthoughts.com/?p=265#comment-918</guid>
		<description>Wow! That was an excellent broadcast!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow! That was an excellent broadcast!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

